Vacuum permittivity, referred to by international standards organizations as the electric constant[1][2], and denoted by the symbol ε0, is a fundamental physical constant relating the mechanical quantities (time, length, mass) to the units for electrical charge, for example, in Coulomb's law.
In SI units the speed of light in vacuum c0[3] is defined as the numerical value c0
299 792 458 m s-1 (NIST definition of meter: see last sentence) and the magnetic constant μ0 is defined as 4π x 10-7 H · m-1 (NIST definition of ampere:see last sentence), leading to an electric constant defined in free space by:
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
A2s4 kg-1m−3 | in SI base units; | |
| or C2N−1m−2 | or F m−1 using derived units. | ||
![]() |
e1V-1m-1 | converting to elementary charges. |
(This value is taken from NIST ε0. A summary of these definitions is provided in the 2006 CODATA Report.[4]) The ellipsis "…" does not indicate experimental uncertainty, but the arbitrary termination of a nonrecurring decimal.
This value is called by various other names as well, including the permittivity of free space,[5] or of empty space,[6] or by the term dielectric constant of vacuum[7] (although this term is ambiguous in modern usage, as described below).
Contents |
In other systems of electromagnetic units, it is common to have
. This is the case in Gaussian units, Lorentz–Heaviside units, and some choices of natural units (while some other choices set
, for example, electrostatic cgs units).
The Coulomb force constant or electrostatic constant ke can thus be expressed as (see Coulomb's law):
Historically, the physical constant ε0 has been known by many different names. The terms "vacuum permittivity" or its variants, such as "permittivity in/of vacuum",[8][9] "permittivity of empty space",[6] or "permittivity of free space"[5][10] are widespread. Standards organizations world-wide now use "electric constant" as a uniform term for this quantity,[1] and official standards documents have adopted the term (although they continue to list the older terms as synonyms).[11][12]
Another historical synonym was "dielectric constant of vacuum", as "dielectric constant" was sometimes used in the past for the absolute permittivity.[7][13] However, in modern usage "dielectric constant" typically refers exclusively to a relative permittivity
and even this usage is considered "obsolete" by some standards bodies in favor of relative static permittivity.[12][14] Hence, the term "dielectric constant of vacuum" for the electric constant ε0 is considered obsolete by most modern authors, although occasional examples of continuing usage can be found.
The more recent term electric constant avoids the use of permittivity in the name of ε0, and also the use of free space and of vacuum (which is not as simple a term as once thought, see free space). The term "electric constant" avoids the suggestion that ε0, which is a derived quantity based upon the defined value of c0 and μ0 as indicated above, is a "property" of anything physically attainable.
As for notation, the constant can be denoted by either
or
, using either of the common glyphs for the letter epsilon.
Free space is an idealized reference state that can be approached but is physically unattainable. Realizable vacuum is called partial vacuum.[15]
The permittivity of free space is ε0 by definition. In other words, the relative permittivity of free space is 1 by definition. Supposing free space were attainable, the meter is defined to make c0 a fixed number, and the ampere is defined so μ0 is a fixed number, thus fixing ε0 as well. (For an introduction to the subject of choices for independent units, see Jackson.[16])
Unlike the vacuum of classical physics, today's physical vacuum corresponds to what is called the vacuum state or the quantum vacuum, which is "by no means a simple empty space".[17][18] Thus, free space is not a synonym for the physical vacuum. For more detail, see the articles on free space and vacuum state.
Regarding any partial vacuum used in a laboratory to set up standards for the SI units, the question arises whether that partial vacuum is an adequate realization of free space, and just what corrections (if any) must be applied to the experimental results. For example, corrections for non-zero pressure could be made.[19] Should experiment eventually support new features of the vacuum state,[20] the predicted corrections to date are so small that they would have no effect upon the "necessary corrections [to] be applied to take account of actual conditions"[19] in setting up standards for the meter or ampere.
For a discussion of achieving a good partial vacuum, see the articles ultra high vacuum and free space.